I recently shared a post on Facebook highlighting some of the cost-saving and sustainability projects in neighboring municipalities. Croton is pulling in roughly $500,000 a year with solar canopies over the MTA parking lot, and Philipstown wiped out electric bills on three municipal buildings with panels on the highway garage roof.
The Supervisor commented on the post that the Board sent “it” (a study on solarizing our municipal buildings) to the town’s Climate Smart Community task force and Sustainable Westchester, and that the experts came back saying it wasn’t worth the money.
He also told me I needed to pay attention.
I do pay attention. And here’s what I see.
Town board meetings begin slowly with reviews of community events and multiple proclamations, then, more often than not, quickly devolve into barbed back-and-forth between board members. When a resident uses their three minutes at Public Comment to raise something the Supervisor doesn’t want to hear, the response is often condescension rather than an answer.
Week after week, month after month, a Councilmember asks about the status of a municipal project, and the Supervisor chastises them for not paying attention, or other Board members mock them.
There is one moment in particular that stays with me. A Girl Scout troop came to a Board meeting to talk about a community project they wanted to do for Yorktown. The students sat in the audience and watched while the conversation at the dais broke down into a 20-minute shouting match. I also sat in the audience, embarrassed by the behavior of those meant to be setting the example for these young women.
There was no call to order. There was no call for decorum. The Supervisor had the gavel, but never used it.
Meetings that run this way don’t just waste an evening. They’re why residents stop showing up, why projects sit for months without answers, and why a development wins approval on the strength of a commitment nobody tracks.
I do pay attention. And what I see is a Town Board that could serve Yorktown far better than it currently does, and residents who are paying the price.
The measure of leadership
A successful leader is able to identify a problem and bring appropriate solutions to bear. One without the other is insufficient.
When I chaired a Task Force for a Board on which I served, we were facing a significant budget shortfall. Two board members had polar opposite views on how to solve it. I made sure they were both on the committee. We worked through options together and found a combination of solutions that closed the shortfall without pricing families out of the programs. We spent the next few months meeting with members to communicate the upcoming changes and how the decision was made. We met face-to-face with those affected by our policy.
Strong leaders invite diverse perspectives, then do the work to turn them into a real answer. They communicate openly and freely; they don’t shy away from difficult conversations. Yorktown’s Town Board could use that same approach.
Successful leaders run effective meetings that include status reports, with timelines and action items. Department heads should give monthly, rotating updates, so every project gets a real answer on a real schedule, and residents don’t wait months to find out what happened to a promise made at a podium. Board members should bring back recommendations from the Advisory Boards they liaise with. The Board should hold respectful, thoughtful discussions of the issues before it. The Supervisor should be able to refocus the discussion when a meeting breaks down. And when a development is approved, the Supervisor should follow up to make sure the promises attached to it are kept.
Indeed, I do pay attention, and I know Yorktown residents are paying attention as well.










